US

Minimum Wage

Question A:

Raising the federal minimum wage to $9 per hour would make it noticeably harder for low-skilled workers to find employment.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

The distortionary costs of raising the federal minimum wage to $9 per hour and indexing it to inflation are sufficiently small compared with the benefits to low-skilled workers who can find employment that this would be a desirable policy.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
The weight of the evidence is that a modest increase in the minimum will have a small negative effect on employment of low skill workers.
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
I'm not aware of any strong evidence demonstrating this result.
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Even among hourly paid workers with less than a high school diploma, only about 11% earn the Fed min wage or less.
-see background information here
Currie
Janet Currie
Princeton
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Past minimum wage increases have not had large disemployment effects, but we are still suffering high unemploment so effects may be worse.
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
The "noticeably" made me pause. A bit harder yes, but not sure how noticeably.
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Goldin
Claudia Goldin
Harvard
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Some
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
The empirical evidence now pretty decisively shows no employment effect, even a few years later. See Dube, Lester and Reich in the REStat
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
I'm aware that some fairly clean natural experiments have not found effects.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Unemployment among low-skilled workers is already high by historic standards, indicating that wages are already too high for market-clearing
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
For some it will definitely reduce opportunities, but in other places it will not even be binding Net effect is hard to tell
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
There would surely be some effect, but "noticeably" seems a reach.
Shin
Hyun Song Shin
Princeton
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Yes, I know the Econ 101 answer but the evidence suggests the effect on employment is between small and 0,.
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
There is little evidence that small changes in minimum wage cause employment falls, but this is larger.
Zingales
Luigi Zingales
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Expected earnings of low skill workers will rise because higher wages/hours will more than offset reduced employment.
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
Strongly Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Decades of research on the minimum wage in the U.S. find that the distortionary effects are quite small.
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Important to compare to alternatives like EITC.
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
About half min wage workers are under 25. About a quarter of min wage workers are working fewer than 35 hours per week.
-see background information here
Currie
Janet Currie
Princeton
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Given that we have a minimum wage, indexing it would make a lot of sense.
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
The evidence is pretty clear that employment effects are small and benefits to workers are first order.
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Goldberg
Pinelopi Goldberg
Yale
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Goldin
Claudia Goldin
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Depends what your social welfare function looks like
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
The benefits go to the somewhat more skilled at the expense of the lowest, which does not seem to be desirable policy.
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Workers most likely to benefit are those with medium skills. Workers most likely to lose (be unemployed) are those with the lowest skills.
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Total effects are hard to tell, plus there are other policies like the EITC that might be more effective.
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
I think the EITC is better (targeted, not as distortionary).
-see background information here
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Obstfeld
Maurice Obstfeld
Berkeley
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Not the easiest call, but the minimum wage has been higher in real terms in the past, so this would not move us into uncharted waters.
Shin
Hyun Song Shin
Princeton
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Stokey
Nancy Stokey
University of Chicago
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
All methods of helping the poor cause distortions. This one not bad.
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
But there are better alternative policies, most obviously increasing the EITC.
Zingales
Luigi Zingales
Chicago Booth Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History