European IGM Economic Experts Panel and their Universities

   
Harvard
Bio/Vote History
Imperial College London
Bio/Vote History
Harvard
Bio/Vote History
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Bio/Vote History
Paris School of Economics
Bio/Vote History
LSE
Bio/Vote History
Peterson Institute
Bio/Vote History
Stanford
Bio/Vote History
University College London
Bio/Vote History
Bocconi
Bio/Vote History
Paris School of Economics
Bio/Vote History
LSE
Bio/Vote History
University College London
Bio/Vote History
Universität Zurich
Bio/Vote History
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Bio/Vote History
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Bio/Vote History
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Bio/Vote History
LSE
Bio/Vote History
Bocconi
Bio/Vote History
University of Manchester
Bio/Vote History
Chicago Booth
Bio/Vote History
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
Bio/Vote History
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Bio/Vote History
Trinity College Dublin
Bio/Vote History
LSE
Bio/Vote History
Central European University
Bio/Vote History
Goethe University Frankfurt
Bio/Vote History
Stockholm University
Bio/Vote History
Bocconi
Bio/Vote History
Chicago Booth
Bio/Vote History
Yale
Bio/Vote History
Oxford
Bio/Vote History
Oxford
Bio/Vote History
Università di Napoli Federico II
Bio/Vote History
Chicago Booth
Bio/Vote History
Stockholm University
Bio/Vote History
LSE
Bio/Vote History
London Business School
Bio/Vote History
Chicago Booth
Bio/Vote History
London Business School
Bio/Vote History
CEMFI
Bio/Vote History
London Business School
Bio/Vote History
MIT
Bio/Vote History
MIT
Bio/Vote History
Oxford
Bio/Vote History
University of Zurich
Bio/Vote History
Gutenberg University Mainz and INSEAD
Bio/Vote History
University College Dublin
Bio/Vote History
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Bio/Vote History
Universität Zurich
Bio/Vote History

About the European IGM Economic Experts Panel

This panel explores the views of European economists on vital public policy issues. It does this by polling them on important policy questions, by including a way for them to explain their answers briefly if they wish, and by disseminating these responses directly to the public in a simple format.

To that end, our panel was chosen to include distinguished experts with a keen interest in public policy from the main areas of economics, to be geographically diverse, and to include older and younger scholars. As with the IGM’s US panel, the experts are all outstanding researchers in their fields. The panel includes recipients of top national and international prizes in economics, fellows of the Econometric society and the European Economic Association, members of distinguished national and international policymaking bodies in Europe, recipients of significant grants for economic research, highly accomplished affiliates and program directors of the Centre for Economic Policy Research and the National Bureau of Economic Research, and past and current editors of leading academic journals in the profession. This approach not only provides a set of panelists whose names will be familiar to other economists and the media, but also delivers a group with impeccable qualifications to speak on public policy matters in Europe and beyond.

Questions for the European IGM Economic Experts Panel are emailed individually to all members of the panel. They are phrased as statements with which one can agree or disagree. The experts are also asked how confident they are in their knowledge of the issue associated with the question (10 being highest). Each panelist responds electronically at his or her convenience. Panelists may consult whatever resources they like before answering. They may also include brief comments with their responses, or provide links to relevant sources.

It is important to explain one aspect of our voting process. In some instances a panelist may neither agree nor disagree with a statement, and there can be two very different reasons for this. One case occurs when an economist knows a lot about a topic and yet sees the evidence on the exact claim at hand as ambiguous. In such cases our panelists vote "uncertain". A second case relates to statements on topics so far removed from the economist's knowledge that he or she does not feel well placed to judge. In this case, our panelists vote "no opinion".

Panelists suggest many of the questions themselves. Members of the public are also welcome to suggest questions (see link below). Although IGM faculty members are responsible for deciding the final version of each question, we send a draft of the question to the panel in advance and invite them to point out problems with the wording if they see any. This process helps us to reduce vagueness or problems of interpretation.

The panel data are copyrighted by the Initiative on Global Markets and will be analyzed for an article to appear in a peer-reviewed journal.

chicago booth