Energy Sources

Question A:

Subsidizing renewable energy sources is better than taxing fossil fuels, assuming the subsidy or tax would be set at levels that would reduce carbon emissions by an equivalent amount.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question B:

Germany’s solar-energy subsidies to date have produced net social benefits for Germany.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question C:

Solar-energy subsidies to date in Germany and other countries have produced net social benefits for the world.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Question A Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Aghion
Philippe Aghion
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
There seem to be strong learning by doing effects. Subsidies can help target these where these effects are largest.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Besley
Timothy J. Besley
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
First pass: Fight a distortion, don't create a second one.
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Subsidies need to be financed through taxing other tax bases, with new distortions. Better to stick with the polluter-payer principle.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Giavazzi
Francesco Giavazzi
Bocconi
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hellwig
Martin Hellwig
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Subsidizing renewable energy may induce innovation through learning by doing. Taxing carbon may just induce cross-border substitution.
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Better potential for double dividend.
Kleven
Henrik Kleven
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Krusell
Per Krusell
Stockholm University
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
A tax is a more direct instrument for reducing emissions - the main goal - and R&D subsidies are at best an imperfect substitute.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
CO2 tax better than either one; Subs require govmnt to pick energy source & hard to justify unless spur innovation w/ large spillovers.
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Neary
Peter Neary
Oxford
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Given revenue neutrality, choosing between the policies hinges on uncertainty (which renewables?) & on macro considerations: stimulus better
O'Rourke
Kevin O'Rourke
Oxford
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
Tax plus subsidy acts on two fronts
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Budget constraint
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Pollution needs to be taxed. Governments need revenues.
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Carbon taxes can be very effective in steering technical change & doesn't require so direction http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1178.pdf
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Strongly Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
Activities that generate negative externalities need direct discouragement
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Weder di Mauro
Beatrice Weder di Mauro
The Graduate Institute, Geneva Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Disagree
4
Bio/Vote History
These are equivalent measures, except that the first one raises the tax burden while the second one reduces it ceteris paribus.
Zilibotti
Fabrizio Zilibotti
Yale University
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History

Question B Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Aghion
Philippe Aghion
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
The quicker we get up the learning curve for these technologies the better.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Besley
Timothy J. Besley
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Uncertain
1
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Quite inefficient policy. Coal plants are still alive. Cost passed on households.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Giavazzi
Francesco Giavazzi
Bocconi
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hellwig
Martin Hellwig
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
We all feel so good about them!!! :-) A serious answer to the question is hardly possible.
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Kleven
Henrik Kleven
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Krusell
Per Krusell
Stockholm University
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
My understanding is that they have been very costly and not paid back for Germany.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Uncertain
9
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Wide range of estimates&benefits abroad; FiT&output sub often expensive; wind did better. Maybe offsetting benefits w/ energy independence
-see background information here
-see background information here
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Neary
Peter Neary
Oxford
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
These policies are a global public good: clear net benefits for the world (emissions fall) but not necessarily for Germany
O'Rourke
Kevin O'Rourke
Oxford
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
I don't know enough about them to judge
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Germany has fiscal space.
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
German energy policy relies far too much on coal. Needs meaningful carbon price.
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
They look a high-cost way to get the benefits, many of which are non-German. Hard to judge the net effect.
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Weder di Mauro
Beatrice Weder di Mauro
The Graduate Institute, Geneva Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Zilibotti
Fabrizio Zilibotti
Yale University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History

Question C Participant Responses

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Aghion
Philippe Aghion
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Allen
Franklin Allen
Imperial College London
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Not so clear solar-power is the best alternative for Germany. I am afraid I don't know enough about the technologies and Germany's climate.
Antras
Pol Antras
Harvard
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Besley
Timothy J. Besley
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Blanchard
Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Bloom
Nicholas Bloom
Stanford
Agree
2
Bio/Vote History
Blundell
Richard William Blundell
University College London Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Bénassy-Quéré
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré
Paris School of Economics
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
The problem is less solar-energy subsidies than the phasing out of nuclear power.
Carletti
Elena Carletti
Bocconi
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Danthine
Jean-Pierre Danthine
Paris School of Economics
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe
LSE
Uncertain
6
Bio/Vote History
Eeckhout
Jan Eeckhout
UPF Barcelona
Uncertain
7
Bio/Vote History
Fehr
Ernst Fehr
Universität Zurich Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Freixas
Xavier Freixas
Barcelona GSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Fuchs-Schündeln
Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Galí
Jordi Galí
Barcelona GSE
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Garicano
Luis Garicano
LSE Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Giavazzi
Francesco Giavazzi
Bocconi
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Griffith
Rachel Griffith
University of Manchester
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Guerrieri
Veronica Guerrieri
Chicago Booth
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Guiso
Luigi Guiso
Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hellwig
Martin Hellwig
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Agree
8
Bio/Vote History
China is exporting lots of solar panels!
Honohan
Patrick Honohan
Trinity College Dublin
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Kleven
Henrik Kleven
Princeton Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Krahnen
Jan Pieter Krahnen
Goethe University Frankfurt
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Krusell
Per Krusell
Stockholm University
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
The R&D has had benefits and the point is that they are global, not German-specific. I have not seen any cost-benefit analysis though.
Kőszegi
Botond Kőszegi
Central European University
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
La Ferrara
Eliana La Ferrara
Harvard Kennedy Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Leuz
Christian Leuz
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Subs spurred tech dev & adoption that w’d not have occurred as quickly; also evidence of tech spillovers but size unclear yet crucial to Q.
-see background information here
Meghir
Costas Meghir
Yale Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Neary
Peter Neary
Oxford
Strongly Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Definitely positive, though clearly not necessarily very large relative to the scale of global emissions
O'Rourke
Kevin O'Rourke
Oxford
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Pagano
Marco Pagano
Università di Napoli Federico II
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Pastor
Lubos Pastor
Chicago Booth
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Persson
Torsten Persson
Stockholm University Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Pissarides
Christopher Pissarides
London School of Economics and Political Science
Strongly Agree
9
Bio/Vote History
They have reduced carbon emissions
Portes
Richard Portes
London Business School
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
Prendergast
Canice Prendergast
Chicago Booth
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Reichlin
Lucrezia Reichlin
London Business School Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Repullo
Rafael Repullo
CEMFI
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Rey
Hélène Rey
London Business School
Agree
7
Bio/Vote History
Positive externality of more solar energy adoption
Schoar
Antoinette Schoar
MIT
Uncertain
8
Bio/Vote History
Van Reenen
John Van Reenen
LSE
Agree
6
Bio/Vote History
Vickers
John Vickers
Oxford
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Again they look a high-cost way of doing it, even allowing for dynamic cost-reduction effects on solar power.
Voth
Hans-Joachim Voth
University of Zurich
Uncertain
5
Bio/Vote History
Weder di Mauro
Beatrice Weder di Mauro
The Graduate Institute, Geneva Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Whelan
Karl Whelan
University College Dublin Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Wyplosz
Charles Wyplosz
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
The rest of the world stands to benefit from less toxic emissions in Germany at German taxpayer's expense.
Zilibotti
Fabrizio Zilibotti
Yale University
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History