US

Corporate Social Responsibility

It is best for society if the management of U.S. publicly traded corporations only considers the impact of their decisions on customers, employees, and community members to the extent that these impacts feedback to impact shareholder wealth.

Responses weighted by each expert's confidence

Participant University Vote Confidence Bio/Vote History
Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu
MIT
Disagree
3
Bio/Vote History
Is it ok for companies to cheat to max shareholder value? Where do you draw the line? A broader set of objectives for companies is a must.
Alesina
Alberto Alesina
Harvard
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Altonji
Joseph Altonji
Yale
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Auerbach
Alan Auerbach
Berkeley
Uncertain
3
Bio/Vote History
Autor
David Autor
MIT
No Opinion
Bio/Vote History
Baicker
Katherine Baicker
University of Chicago Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Banerjee
Abhijit Banerjee
MIT
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Bertrand
Marianne Bertrand
Chicago
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Brunnermeier
Markus Brunnermeier
Princeton
Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Chetty
Raj Chetty
Harvard Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Chevalier
Judith Chevalier
Yale
Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Cutler
David Cutler
Harvard
Uncertain
4
Bio/Vote History
Deaton
Angus Deaton
Princeton
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
What we have now is a disaster. Boards controlled by CEO shareholders who enrich themselves at others expense esp workers.
Duffie
Darrell Duffie
Stanford
Strongly Disagree
9
Bio/Vote History
Negative externalities. Example: If pollution regulation is too weak (likely true), then shareholder maximization ignores social costs.
Edlin
Aaron Edlin
Berkeley
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Eichengreen
Barry Eichengreen
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Einav
Liran Einav
Stanford
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Fair
Ray Fair
Yale
Disagree
1
Bio/Vote History
Finkelstein
Amy Finkelstein
MIT Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Goolsbee
Austan Goolsbee
Chicago
Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Greenstone
Michael Greenstone
University of Chicago
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
h/t to Judy Chevalier: phrasing would approve of a firm illegally emitting pollutants that kill people if they aren't caught
Hall
Robert Hall
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Hart
Oliver Hart
Harvard
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Companies should maximize shareholder welfare not wealth. If shareholders care about workers and the community, the company should too.
-see background information here
Holmström
Bengt Holmström
MIT
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Don’t know a better stated alternative objective, but It has had varying influnce and interpretation over time.
Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby
Stanford
Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
Hoynes
Hilary Hoynes
Berkeley
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Judd
Kenneth Judd
Stanford
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
I doubt that the shareholder maximizing efforts of the makers of OxyContin was good for society.
Kaplan
Steven Kaplan
Chicago Booth
Strongly Agree
10
Bio/Vote History
While alternatives may seem attractive, they are difficult if not impossible to measure, implement and govern.
Kashyap
Anil Kashyap
Chicago Booth
Uncertain
2
Bio/Vote History
Usually doing evil things are bad for shareholders too, the question is how often and important are the exceptions -- hard to generalize
Klenow
Pete Klenow
Stanford
Agree
3
Bio/Vote History
I prefer to use transparent taxes and regulations to correct market failures (and government failures).
Levin
Jonathan Levin
Stanford Did Not Answer Bio/Vote History
Maskin
Eric Maskin
Harvard
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Corporations are accountable to their shareholders, but shareholders may well want their companies to behave socially responsibly.
Nordhaus
William Nordhaus
Yale
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
Saez
Emmanuel Saez
Berkeley
Strongly Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Samuelson
Larry Samuelson
Yale
Disagree
6
Bio/Vote History
Maximizing shareholder wealth would be best for society in a perfect world, but externalities can cause interests to diverge.
Scheinkman
José Scheinkman
Columbia University
Disagree
8
Bio/Vote History
Schmalensee
Richard Schmalensee
MIT
Agree
4
Bio/Vote History
Often, though, CEOs seem to ignore those feedbacks or pretend they can prevent them.
Shapiro
Carl Shapiro
Berkeley
Strongly Disagree
10
Bio/Vote History
Shimer
Robert Shimer
University of Chicago
Agree
5
Bio/Vote History
Stock
James Stock
Harvard
Disagree
5
Bio/Vote History
Thaler
Richard Thaler
Chicago Booth
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
The Supreme Court declared that corporations have rights like citizens. With rights come obligations. Firms can choose to be good citizens.
Udry
Christopher Udry
Northwestern
Strongly Disagree
7
Bio/Vote History
The world is not, in fact, frictionless and perfectly competitive. Rents abound, and the is room for multiple objectives.