Latest Headline

Let’s Not Pursue the Volcker Rule

igmforum editor - March 3rd, 2010

U.S. Monetary Policy Forum; New York, New York
Frebruary 26, 2010

On Friday February 26, the IGM hosted its annual “ U.S. Monetary Policy Forum

 

Started by faculty members from the Initiative on Global Markets at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business

Global markets have generated confusion among policymakers and the public. The IGM promotes sound analysis of how these markets work, their effects, and the way they interact with policies and institutions.

IGM Home

 

Financial Regulatory Reform

March 1st, 2010 by igmforum editor

Comments by Governor Daniel Tarullo
U.S. Monetary Policy Forum, New York, New York
February 26th, 2010

Daniel Tarullo, Federal Reserve Board of Governors, participated in a panel discussion at the 2010 US Monetary Policy Forum on financial regulatory reform. The panelists discussed priorities for improving financial regulation. This included an assessment of issues where a consensus is emerging as to how reform should proceed and the identification of open questions where agreement about the way forward is uncertain.  The panel discussed how regulatory choices will impact monetary policy making and other Federal Reserve responsibilities.

Read comments>

Faculty Panel: “The Euro in Crisis”

February 24th, 2010 by igmforum editor

The recent decision by European governments to bail out Greece has raised questions about the viability of the single currency area in Europe. Professors John Cochrane, Roger Myerson, and Luigi Zingales will discuss the bailout decision, the foundations of the euro area, and its future.  Professor Anil Kashyap moderates the panel.

Watch video

Gene Fama’s Career in Finance

February 15th, 2010 by igmforum editor

This post makes available an autobiographical note by Gene Fama that was commissioned by the Annual Review of Financial Economics. Gene’s remarkable career and vision, to say nothing of his engaging writing style, make this short piece a must read for anyone interested in finance. However, as his colleagues, we believe his modesty led him to omit three crucial aspects of his contributions.

First, Gene was (and still is) essential to shaping the nature of the finance group at Chicago. As he explains in a somewhat understated fashion, he and Merton Miller transformed the finance group turning it into a research oriented unit. For the last 47 years he has held court on Tuesday afternoons in the finance workshop, in a room that now bears his name. Through the workshop, generations of students, colleagues, and visitors have been and continue to be exposed to his research style of developing and rigorously testing theories with real world data that has become the hallmark of Chicago finance.

Second, and equally important, is his leadership. Rather than rest on his laurels or impose his own views on the group, Gene has always sought the truth, even when it appeared at odds with his own views. He has promoted a contest of ideas and outlooks, all subject to his exceptional standards of quality. The makeup of the group has shifted as the world and what we know about it has changed. The current finance group at Chicago includes a diverse set of people who specialize in all areas of modern finance including, behavioral economics, pure theory, and emerging, non-traditional areas such as entrepreneurship and development that were unheard of when Gene arrived at Chicago. Contrary to the caricatured descriptions, there is no single Chicago view of finance, except that the path to truth comes from the rigorous development and confrontation of theories with data.

Finally, each of us has our own personal examples of Gene’s generosity, kindness and mentorship.   He is an impeccable role model. He is in his office every day, and his door is always open. By personal example, he sets the standards for the values and ethics by which we do research and run our school. All of us have learned enormously from Gene’s generous willingness to discuss his and our work, and gently and patiently to explain and debate that work with generations of faculty.  Gene likely enjoys as high a ranking in the “thanks for comments” footnotes of published papers as he does in citations.  He has made the finance group an exciting, collegial, and welcoming place to work. He has greatly enhanced all of our research careers and accomplishments. He is a great friend, and we can only begin to express our gratitude.

We hope you enjoy reading Gene’s description of his career that might just as well be described as the story of how modern finance evolved at Chicago.

Gene’s Tenured Finance Faculty Colleagues at Chicago Booth

John H. Cochrane, George M. Constantinides, Douglas W. Diamond, Milton Harris, John C. Heaton, Steven Neil Kaplan, Anil K Kashyap, Richard Leftwich, Tobias J. Moskowitz, Lubos Pastor, Raghuram G. Rajan, Richard Thaler, Pietro Veronesi, Robert W. Vishny, and Luigi Zingales

Read note>

How to make a bank raise equity

February 8th, 2010 by igmforum editor

By Oliver Hart and Luigi Zingales
FT.com, February 7th, 2010

In the struggle to identify how to avoid a repeat of last year’s financial crisis there is an emerging consensus among regulators, academics and practitioners that contingent convertible (Coco) bonds are the way to go. The idea is to have some debt in the capital structure of banks that converts into equity when a bank faces financial distress.

Read article>

Lessons from the Financial Crisis

January 26th, 2010 by igmforum editor

By John H. Cochrane
Regulation Winter 2009-2010

With the benefit of a year’s hindsight, we can now look on the financial crisis and determine what was really the central problem, as well as identify what are the most important policy changes needed to avoid repeating the crisis. In my view, the usual suspects — “global imbalances” of saving or imports and exports, the Fed’s low rates, a housing “bubble,” subprime mortgages, fancy derivatives — are not that important. Once we put all that aside, I think we can focus on the real problems and their solution.

Read more>

Return Our Investment

January 20th, 2010 by igmforum editor

By Douglas Diamond and Anil K Kashyap
The New York Times, Op-ed

WALL STREET is considering legal action to prevent President Obama from imposing a new tax on bailed-out financial institutions. Because the law that created the Troubled Asset Relief Program compels the government to recoup the bailout money, it’s unlikely that banks will succeed in avoiding recompense. So rather than debate the constitutionality of the proposed tax, it is far more productive to design the best possible repayment plan.

Read more>

Faculty Panel on Ethics

January 13th, 2010 by igmforum editor

Professors Steven Kaplan, Tobias Moskowitz, and Luigi Zingales discuss the ethics and the role of ethics on Wall Street, in the past, the present, and going into the future.

Watch video>
View Kaplan slides>
View Moskowitz slides>

Should Executive Pay Be Regulated?

December 30th, 2009 by igmforum editor

Myron Scholes Forum, December 3, 2009

Professor Steven N. Kaplan discusses (1) whether CEO pay is out of control; (2) the role of pay at banks and financial firms in regard to the financial crisis; and (3) whether proposed new regulations and caps make sense.

Watch video>
View Slides>

A Tax on Short-term Debt Would Stabilize the System

December 17th, 2009 by igmforum editor

By Luigi Zingales
FT.com, December 16th, 2009

The idea of imposing a tax on financial transactions, also called the Tobin tax after the economist who first proposed it, is back in vogue. It has strong political appeal, catering to demands to punish banks for the crisis they have bestowed. It satisfies the political need to do something to avoid a repeat of the crisis. And, at a time of fiscal crisis, it provides an easy way to raise revenues without increasing income taxes. Last Friday, European Union leaders urged the International Monetary Fund to consider such a tax.

Read more>